Friday, March 30, 2012

The Doctrine of Discovery: The International Law of Colonialism


Professor Robert J Miller, Lewis & Clark Law School

Johnson v. M’Intosh, 21 U.S. (8 Wheat.) 543 (1823).

Here are the 10 elements that I think constitute the Doctrine and are useful in analyzing and comparing how settler/colonizer societies have used this international law against Indigenous peoples around the globe.  Robert J. Miller, Native America, Discovered and Conquered: Thomas Jefferson, Lewis & Clark, and Manifest Destiny 3-5 (Praeger Publishers, 2006; paperback edition University of Nebraska Press, 2008).

1. First discovery.

The first European country to discover lands unknown to other Europeans claimed property and sovereign rights over the lands and native peoples. First discovery, however, was usually considered to have created only an incomplete title.

2. Actual occupancy and current possession. 

To turn first discovery into recognized title, a European country had to actually occupy and possess newly found lands. This was usually done by building forts or settlements. Physical possession had to be accomplished within a reasonable amount of time after the first discovery to create a complete title.

3. Preemption/European title.
 

Discovering European countries also claimed the power of preemption, that is, the sole right to buy the land from Indigenous peoples. This is a valuable property right similar to an exclusive option to purchase land. The government that owned the preemption right prevented or preempted any other European government or individual from buying land from the native owners.  The United States still claims this power over Indian lands today. 25 U.S.C. section 177 (2006).

4. Indian or Native title. 

After first discovery, Euro-American legal systems claimed that Indigenous Peoples and nations had lost their full property rights and full ownership of their lands. Europeans claimed that Indigenous nations only retained the rights to occupy and use their lands. Nevertheless, these rights could last forever if they never consented to sell to the European country that claimed the preemption power. If Indigenous nations did choose to sell, they were only supposed to deal with the government that held the preemption right. Thus, “Indian title” in the United States, and ‘Maori title’ in New Zealand, and Indigenous titles elsewhere allegedly defined limited ownership rights.

5. Tribal limited sovereign and commercial rights.
 

After a first discovery, Europeans considered that Indigenous Nations and Peoples had lost some aspects of their inherent sovereign powers and their rights to international free trade and diplomatic relations. Thereafter, they were only supposed to deal with the European government that had first discovered them.

6. Contiguity. 

Under Discovery, Europeans claimed a significant amount of land contiguous to and surrounding their actual discoveries and settlements in the New World. Contiguity became very important when different European countries had settlements somewhat close together. In that situation, each country claimed to hold rights over the unoccupied lands between their settlements to a point half way between the actual settlements. Moreover, contiguity held that the discovery of the mouth of a river gave the discovering country a claim over all the lands drained by that river; even if that was thousands of miles of territory. For example, refer to the boundaries of the Louisiana Territory and Oregon country as defined by the United States.

7. Terra nullius.

 This phrase literally means a land or earth that is null or void or empty. This element stated that if lands were not possessed or occupied by any person or nation, or even if they were occupied but were not being used in a fashion that European legal and property systems approved, then the lands were considered to be “empty” and available for Discovery claims. Europeans were very liberal in applying this element and often considered lands that were actually owned, occupied, and being used by Indigenous Peoples to be “vacant” and available for Discovery claims if they were not being “used” according to Euro-American laws and cultural mores.

8. Christianity. 

Religion was a significant aspect of the Doctrine of Discovery. Under Discovery, non-Christian peoples were not deemed to have the same rights to land, sovereignty, and self-determination as Christians.

9. Civilization. 

The European ideals of civilization were important parts of Discovery and of ideas of superiority. Europeans thought that God had directed them to bring civilized ways and education and religion to Indigenous Peoples and to exercise paternalism and guardianship powers over them.

10. Conquest.

 This element claimed that Europeans could acquire Indian title by military victories in “just” and “necessary” wars. In addition, conquest was also used as a term of art to describe the property rights Europeans claimed to have gained automatically over Indigenous Nations just by showing up and making a “first discovery.”


For a comparative law analysis of the use of the Doctrine of Discovery in different European and settler societies, see generally Robert J. Miller, The International Law of Colonialism: A Comparative Analysis, 15 Lewis & Clark L. Rev. 847 (2012); Robert J. Miller & Micheline D’Angelis, Brazil, Indigenous Peoples, and the International Law of Discovery, 37 Brooklyn J. Int’l Law 1 (2011); Robert J. Miller, Lisa Lesage & Sebastian Lopez Escarcena, The International Law of Discovery, Indigenous Peoples, and Chile, 89 Nebraska L. Rev. 819 (2011); Robert J. Miller, Jacinta Ruru, Larissa Behrendt & Tracey Lindberg, Discovering Indigenous Lands: The Doctrine of Discovery in the English Colonies (Oxford Univ. Press, 2010, paperback 2012); Robert J. Miller & Jacinta Ruru, An Indigenous Lens into Comparative Law: The Doctrine of Discovery in the United States and New Zealand, 111 West Vir. L. Rev. 849 (2009).

6 comments:

  1. Very enlightening. Looking into the 18 "secret" treaties with the California indigenous people and the canonization of Father Serra

    ReplyDelete
  2. How do you know if you really need to sell your land fast?

    One of the biggest problems landowners deal with on a regular basis is trying to quickly sell a property that they no longer need. There can be literally hundreds of reasons why someone would need to get rid of their vacant land fast and without any effort on their part. In this article, we will cover the top 5 reasons people need to sell their land, and explore what drives that initial decision to seek a solution to a growing problem.


    1. The land was inherited, or unexpectedly given
    As most people know, when a landowner passes away, the deed to that property will oftentimes go to a relative or family member. Many times, the heir is not financially or emotionally ready for land ownership, and when it comes time to pay property taxes or legal issues arise,the land becomes a burden to them. This leads them to seek out an easy solution to their problem.

    2. The property taxes on the land are too much to handle.
    Even when the property was purchased, not inherited, it can still be a financial burden. Depending on the county that the land is located in, and a variety of other factors, property taxes can range from really cheap to reallyexpensive. And depending on the State, unpaid (delinquent) property taxes canincreaseexcessively if not paid. When many landowners realize that their property taxes have been delinquent with the county, they seek a fast way to sell the land and not worry about it going to foreclosure. http://www.purelandbuyers.com

    ReplyDelete
  3. Among the many theories about which civilization first sailed to the Americas and discovered them, besides Vikings there is also the theory that the ancient Phoenicians were the first people who discovered America.

    In future certainly will be other theories

    invenitmundo.blogspot.com/2017/04/a-stunning-theory-claims-that-americas-were-discovered-in-antiquity.html

    ReplyDelete

  4. free parking software
    apartments
    violation management
    Explore the Web Based Softwaare of Web Parking Software:
    For those people who are in search for the best web based software that are creatively developed, designed and intended for solving parking problems, you don’t need to look any further since Web Parking Software is the ideal choice that you should take into account. In addition to this, the company strives hard and work together to make their parking related services quickly accessible from the Internet. Web Parking Software has a professional, dependable and competent management team with in-depth expertise in the field of parking management, business management and IT computer software.
    The well trained and fully skilled engineers of Web Parking Software spent almost two years with their parking management team to create their first parking management and permit system. Apart from this, the company took daily procedures on snail mail, fax, phone and paper for almost a decade and at the same time applied a cloud based internet delivery system to enhance the reliability, organization and method. On the other hand, the web based software of Web Parking Software has an excellent deal of programming complex code and man hours.
    The entire interface was built to look simple and with a few mouse clicks, you will have a full control of your own building. They also include other non parking components that have the ability to facilitate management that include CRM components, email blasts and a lot more. Moreover, Web Parking Software together with their sister company Callbeforetow are part of CBT software that is fully operated by CBT Inc. The company wants to take the dissatisfaction out of parking management for townhouses, condominiums, home owners associations, apartments and other parking areas. This is one of the reasons why Web Parking Software has reinvented how the parking management should be done.
    The web based software of Web Parking Software was built for commercial property, board members, apartment managers, property managers and anyone involved in overseeing a managed parking environment. With the existence and help of Web Parking Software, you can be sure that all your parking problems will be completely solved by simply using the web based parking software of Web Parking Software. The web based parking software of Web Parking Software is a great system that will allow you to have a full control over your buildings whether onsite, by using your phone and even at your office. Most people who already tried and avail the services of Web Parking Software are all astounded and satisfied with the quality of their web based parking software.
    Once you decided to use their service, you are assured that you can able to eliminate about 75 percent of your paper work. Web Parking Software will guarantee their valued clients that they will never be disappointed with their services and most especially their web based parking software. If you want to learn and know more about the web based parking software of Web Parking Software, just feel free to visit their website at http://webparkingsoftware.com and see it for yourself.


    ReplyDelete


  5. We take the frustration out of parking management for Apartments, Home Owners Associations, Condominiums, Townhouses Co-ops, and other parking areas.Webparkingsoftware.com has reinvented how parking management should be done.

    Parking software condominium
    email blast to tenants
    Guest parking

    ReplyDelete